| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Indexed | Hearing |
|---|
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, UNLAWFUL DETAINER
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD24676980 - February 6, 2026 Hearing date: February 6, 2026 Case number: CUD24676980 Case title: JUN ZHANG VS. MARTIN LEE ENG ET AL Case Number: | | CUD24676980 | Case Title: | | JUN ZHANG VS. MARTIN LEE ENG ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-02-06 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, UNLAWFUL DETAINER | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for February 6, 2026. Line 9.2.
PLAINTIFF JUN ZHANG MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, UNLAWFUL DETAINER is GRANTED. Plaintiff provided prima facie evidence element of this unlawful detainer action, thereby shifting the burden to Defendant to show the existence of a triable issue of material fact. (CCP 437c(p)(1).) Defendant's opposition fails to meet this burden: Defendant offers no competing evidence showing that a triable issue exists as to any of Plaintiff's elements, and admits in his declaration that he does not raise any disputed issues of material fact. =(501/REQ)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).
Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”