DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD24676980·sf·Civil·Unlawful Detainer
Hearing 7 months agoGRANTED in part

JUN ZHANG VS. MARTIN LEE ENG ET AL

MOTION TO STRIKE Amended COMPLAINT

Hearing date
Jan 13, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Strike rulings statewide →

Causes of action

Parties

PlaintiffJUN ZHANG
DefendantMARTIN LEE ENG
DefendantKAREN HAO

Ruling

Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for Jan. 13, 2026. Line 7. DEFENDANT KAREN HAO MOTION TO STRIKE Amended COMPLAINT is GRANTED in part and the following language is stricken as irrelevant from paragraph 5 of the 4th Amended Complaint "Therefore, this Third Amended Complaint is required to remove Units 949 and 951 from the scope of this unlawful detainer, so that" Defendant to file an answer within 5 days of notice of entry of order. =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share