BARRETT DAFFIN FRAPPIER TREDER & WEISS, LLP VS. SHARON DRUMMOND ET AL

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC24614427 - February 3, 2026 Hearing date: February 3, 2026 Case number: CGC24614427 Case title: BARRETT DAFFIN FRAPPIER TREDER & WEISS, LLP VS. SHARON DRUMMOND ET AL Case Number: | | CGC24614427 | Case Title: | | BARRETT DAFFIN FRAPPIER TREDER & WEISS, LLP VS. SHARON DRUMMOND ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-02-03 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Petition And Notice Of Motion; Motion For Distribution Of Surplus Proceeds | Rulings: | | On the Real Property / Housing Court Law and Motion calendar for February 3, 2026, line 4. Defendant's Motion for Distribution of Surplus Proceeds. Hearing Required.

The Court has previously provided moving party and their counsel an opportunity to address the authorities cited in reply and formatting of the reply by submitting a responsive declaration. See December 29, 2025 Minute Order.

A Declaration of Pamela Palmieri was filed on January 13, 2026. It contained no exhibits. It did not mention the authority cited in the reply, CRC 2.259. It mentioned two other purported sources of authority/potentially sources of the language quotes in reply (not clear based on the phrasing of the declaration and lack of exhibits containing such authorities/secondary sources).

Therefore, Pamela Palmieri to appear in person and produce hard copies of the legal authorities/sources used to draft and support the following argument in the Reply brief filed on December 19, 2025: "...California Rules of Court, rule 2.259(a) provides that "a document is deemed filed on the date it is received by the court." Rule 2.259(c) further provides that when a document is rejected and later corrected, "the filing date of the corrected document relates back to the date the document was originally received by the court." The rules expressly distinguish between receipt and acceptance and place the risk of clerical delay on the court, not the litigant." (Reply 2:13-16).

Specifically, the hard copies to be presented to the Court shall reflect the legal source of the language appearing in the Reply in quotation marks, e.g. CRC, CCP, Rutter Guide, any other secondary source, etc. These hard copies must include, but are not limited to, the sources mentioned in the December 19, 2025 Reply and January 13, 2026 Declaration: CRC 2.259; CCP 1010.6(e)(4)(E) and Rutter Group, Civil Procedure Before Trial, 2022 pages 9(I)-799(1-85). Counsel may present hard copies of any other sources used in drafting the relevant section of the Reply that include the language in the quotation marks. Hard copies shall be delivered to the Court by 9:00 a.m. with relevant passages highlighted. These documents may be served on other parties electronically. Counsel shall also bring a hard copy of the Reply. =(501/CFH)