DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC23607890·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing 7 months agoSUSTAINED with leave to amend

MARYCRUZ QUINTERO ET AL VS. BRIDGE CREEK, LLC DBA BRIDGE AT WALNUT CREEK ET AL

DEMURRER to Amended CROSS COMPLAINT

Hearing date
Jan 29, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Demurrer rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffMARYCRUZ QUINTERO
DefendantBRIDGE CREEK, LLC DBA BRIDGE AT WALNUT CREEK
Cross-DefendantBELFOR USA GROUP, INC.
Cross-DefendantBELFOR ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC23607890 - January 29, 2026 Hearing date: January 29, 2026 Case number: CGC23607890 Case title: MARYCRUZ QUINTERO ET AL VS. BRIDGE CREEK, LLC DBA BRIDGE AT WALNUT CREEK ET AL Case Number: | | CGC23607890 | Case Title: | | MARYCRUZ QUINTERO ET AL VS. BRIDGE CREEK, LLC DBA BRIDGE AT WALNUT CREEK ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-01-29 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | DEMURRER to Amended CROSS COMPLAINT | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for January 29, 2026. Line 2.

CROSS DEFENDANT BELFOR USA GROUP, INC., BELFOR ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. DEMURRER to Amended CROSS COMPLAINT is SUSTAINED with leave to amend for Cross-Complaint to allege in good faith the Plaintiffs seek damages for their claims arising out of the condition of the property for the period of time during the Cross-Defendants' involvement with the Property.

The Court notes that Cross-Complaint incorporates the allegations of Plaintiff's complaint into the Cross-Complaint. Those allegations include a statement that at the latest the Plaintiffs provided notice that they would not be returning to the property on December 28, 2022 and the last date for damages arising out of the condition of the property is January 1, 2023. Cross-Complaint in turn alleges that the Cross-Defendant's estimate for work to be performed at the property was not approved until January 3, 2023 and the work was first performed on January 5, 2023. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share