| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Date |
|---|
DEMURRER to Amended CROSS COMPLAINT
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC25623290 - April 16, 2026 Hearing date: April 16, 2026 Case number: CGC25623290 Case title: CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ET AL VS. JACKSON & TAYLOR VENTURES, LLC; ET AL Case Number: | | CGC25623290 | Case Title: | | CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ET AL VS. JACKSON & TAYLOR VENTURES, LLC; ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-04-16 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | DEMURRER to Amended CROSS COMPLAINT | Rulings: | | On the Real Property/Housing Law and Motion calendar for April 16, 2026, line 3.
Cross-Defendant's Demurrer to Amended Cross-Complaint is sustained with leave to amend to assert a viable claim against 660 Peralta LLC for breach of contract, declaratory relief or indemnity. The operative cross-complaint fails to allege facts supporting a breach of written contract, declaratory relief re: obligations under the written contract or indemnity.
Implied-in-fact contract is not sufficiently stated, and if stated, would not support claims under the written contract with Han; agency theory is not supported by facts alleged in the complaint; alter ego theory is not supported by any authorities cited in opposition allowing for alter ego liability at this stage of the litigation. The Court makes no determination at this time if alter ego liability may be brought up under the procedural posture of the cases cited in opposition.
Han's misjoinder demurrer is moot in light of the above ruling. The Court notes that Han's demurrer is not supported by any citations to case authority, let alone authority involving similar facts. The demurrer, a response to the operative cross-complaint, is proper. =(501/CFH)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849). Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.