DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC25622799·sf·Civil·Real Property/Housing
Hearing 7 months agoGRANTED

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ET AL VS. ANTONIO CASTELLUCCI ET AL

Amended Notice Of Motion And Motion For Preliminary Injunction

Hearing date
Jan 28, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
Plaintiff

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffCITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
PlaintiffTHE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
DefendantANTONIO CASTELLUCCI

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC25622799 - January 28, 2026 Hearing date: January 28, 2026 Case number: CGC25622799 Case title: CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ET AL VS. ANTONIO CASTELLUCCI ET AL Case Number: | | CGC25622799 | Case Title: | | CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ET AL VS. ANTONIO CASTELLUCCI ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-01-28 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Amended Notice Of Motion And Motion For Preliminary Injunction | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for January 28, 2026. Line 7.

PLAINTIFF CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Amended Notice Of Motion And Motion For Preliminary Injunction is GRANTED as requested. No opposition filed. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share