| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Indexed | Hearing |
|---|
Notice Of Motion And Motion For Preliminary Injunction Against Defendant
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC25630402 - March 2, 2026 Hearing date: March 2, 2026 Case number: CGC25630402 Case title: 900 BUSH SF, LLC VS. LA GALLERIA CONDOMINIUM OWNERS ASSOCIATION ET AL Case Number: | | CGC25630402 | Case Title: | | 900 BUSH SF, LLC VS. LA GALLERIA CONDOMINIUM OWNERS ASSOCIATION ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-03-02 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion For Preliminary Injunction Against Defendant | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for March 2, 2026. Line 5.
1. PLAINTIFF 900 BUSH SF, LLC A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY Notice Of Motion And Motion For Preliminary Injunction Against Defendant continued to March 10, 2026 for the moving party to provide a courtesy copy of the moving papers and for the opposing party to provide a properly tabbed courtesy copy of opposition papers (two sets of untabbed opposition and a copy of reply received). =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).
Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”