DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD23671608·sf·Civil·Real Property/Housing
Hearing 12 months agoGRANTED

SF 701 TAYLOR ST, LLC VS. AMY PHILLIPS ET AL

Notice And Motion For Enforcement Of Settlement Agreement, Entry Of Judgment Pursuant To Ccp Section 664.6

Hearing date
Sep 3, 2025
Department
501
Judge
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffSF 701 TAYLOR ST, LLC
DefendantAMY PHILLIPS

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD23671608 - September 3, 2025 Hearing date: September 3, 2025 Case number: CUD23671608 Case title: SF 701 TAYLOR ST, LLC VS. AMY PHILLIPS ET AL Case Number: | | CUD23671608 | Case Title: | | SF 701 TAYLOR ST, LLC VS. AMY PHILLIPS ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-09-03 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notcie And Motion For Enforcement Of Settlement Agreement, Entry Of Judgment Pursuant To Ccp Section 664.6 | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for September 3, 2025 line 5.

PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ENFORCEMENT OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT, ENTRY OF JUDGEMENT is GRANTED. Moving party carried their burden. No opposition filed. =(501/SKF) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom [Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252]. Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share