DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD26682055·sf·Civil·Real Property / Housing
Hearing todayGRANTED

1060 BUSH STREET APARTMENTS, LLC VS. JUSTIN BELTON ET AL

Motion to Vacate Default and Judgment

Hearing date
Aug 18, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

Plaintiff1060 BUSH STREET APARTMENTS, LLC
DefendantJUSTIN BELTON

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD26682055 - August 18, 2026 Hearing date: August 18, 2026 Case number: CUD26682055 Case title: 1060 BUSH STREET APARTMENTS, LLC VS. JUSTIN BELTON ET AL Case Number: | | CUD26682055 | Case Title: | | 1060 BUSH STREET APARTMENTS, LLC VS. JUSTIN BELTON ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-08-18 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion, Motion, Memorandum Of Points And Authorities And Declaration In Support Of Motion To Vacate Default And Judgment; Prosed Response; And Proposed Response | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for August 18, 2026. Line 8.

Defendant's Motion to Vacate Default and Judgment is GRANTED. Plaintiff filed a Memorandum in Support of Defendant's Motion. The default and default judgment entered on July 9, 2026 are set aside and vacated. The writ issued on July 16, 2026 is recalled. Defendant Justin Belton shall file and serve the proposed answer within five days.=(501/SKF)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share