DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD25678412·sf·Civil·Real Property/Housing
Hearing 7 months agoGRANTED

THE JOHN STEWART COMPANY VS. TAMARA RANDALL

Notice Of Motion And Motion For Leave To File An Amended Complaint

Hearing date
Jan 27, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffTHE JOHN STEWART COMPANY
DefendantTAMARA RANDALL

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25678412 - January 27, 2026 Hearing date: January 27, 2026 Case number: CUD25678412 Case title: THE JOHN STEWART COMPANY VS. TAMARA RANDALL Case Number: | | CUD25678412 | Case Title: | | THE JOHN STEWART COMPANY VS. TAMARA RANDALL | Court Date: | | 2026-01-27 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion For Leave To File An Amended Complaint | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for January 27, 2026.

Line 6. PLAINTIFF THE JOHN STEWART COMPANY Motion For Leave To File An Amended Complaint is GRANTED. No opposition filed. =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849). Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share