DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD24675605·sf·Civil·Real Property/Housing
Hearing about 2 months agoGRANTED

GEARY MANOR APARTMENTS, L.P. A CALIFORNIA VS. JOSE S GONZALEZ-SALAZAR ET AL

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO File First Amended Complaint

Hearing date
Jul 9, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffGEARY MANOR APARTMENTS, L.P. A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
DefendantJOSE S GONZALEZ-SALAZAR

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD24675605 - July 9, 2026 Hearing date: July 9, 2026 Case number: CUD24675605 Case title: GEARY MANOR APARTMENTS, L.P. A CALIFORNIA VS. JOSE S GONZALEZ-SALAZAR ET AL Case Number: | | CUD24675605 | Case Title: | | GEARY MANOR APARTMENTS, L.P. A CALIFORNIA VS. JOSE S GONZALEZ-SALAZAR ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-07-09 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION FOR LEAVE TO File First Amended Complaint | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for July 9, 2026. Line 9.

PLAINTIFF GEARY MANOR APARTMENTS, L.P. A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP MOTION FOR LEAVE TO File First Amended Complaint is GRANTED. No opposition filed.

This matter will be heard in department 505 by the Honorable Michelle Tong at 1:30 p.m. per the order of the presiding judge. =(505/MT)

Parties may appear in-person, or via Zoom Video Conference (Meeting ID: 160 4132 4666 Passcode: 872834).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests.

A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share