DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD25679950·sf·Civil·Unlawful Detainer
Hearing 7 months agoDENIED

20 ROMOLO I7, LP VS. SCOTT BIRD ET AL

Notice Of Motion, Motion, Memorandum Of Points And Authorities And Declaration In Support Of Motion To Vacte Default And Judgment

Hearing date
Jan 13, 2026
Department
501
Judge
Prevailing
Plaintiff

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

Plaintiff20 ROMOLO I7, LP
DefendantSCOTT BIRD

Ruling

Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for Jan. 13, 2026. Line 8. DEFENDANT SCOTT BIRD Notice Of Motion, Motion, Memorandum Of Points And Authorities And Declaration In Support Of Motion To Vacte Default And Judgment is DENIED. Moving party failed to carry their burden under CCP 473(b). No explanation is provided for failure to respond to the Summons and Complaint between November 9, 2025 and November 19, 2025. No explanation is provided for failure to address the default diligently after November 19, 2025. =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share