DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD24676980·sf·Civil·Real Property/Housing
Hearing 8 months agoCONTINUED

JUN ZHANG VS. MARTIN LEE ENG ET AL

MOTION TO STRIKE Amended COMPLAINT

Hearing date
Dec 17, 2025
Department
501
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Dec 19, 2025

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Strike rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffJUN ZHANG
DefendantMARTIN LEE ENG

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD24676980 - December 17, 2025 Hearing date: December 17, 2025 Case number: CUD24676980 Case title: JUN ZHANG VS. MARTIN LEE ENG ET AL Case Number: | | CUD24676980 | Case Title: | | JUN ZHANG VS. MARTIN LEE ENG ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-12-17 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION TO STRIKE Amended COMPLAINT | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for December 17, 2025. Line 6.

DEFENDANT MOTION TO STRIKE 3RD Amended COMPLAINT is continued to December 19, 2025.

No later than December 17, 2025, (1) Defendant is ordered to comply with LRSF 2.7B and provide courtesy copies of the moving papers to department 501 with a cover letter reflecting the new hearing date; and (2) Plaintiff is ordered to serve all opposition papers on Defendant by overnight delivery or a method of personal service that is appropriate for a self-represented party, and file proof of said service. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests.

A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share