121 9TH STREET/788 MINNA STREET OWNERS' VS. 121 NINTH, LLC ET AL
DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR ISSUE SANCTIONS, MONETARY SANCTIONS AND ALTERNATIVELY, FURTHER RESPONSES
Motion type
Monetary amounts referenced
Parties
Ruling
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC21592568 - January 9, 2026 Hearing date: January 9, 2026 Case number: CGC21592568 Case title: 121 9TH STREET/788 MINNA STREET OWNERS' VS. 121 NINTH, LLC ET AL Case Number: | | CGC21592568 | Case Title: | | 121 9TH STREET/788 MINNA STREET OWNERS' VS. 121 NINTH, LLC ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-01-09 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR ISSUE SANCTIONS, MONETARY SANCTIONS AND ALTERNATIVELY, FURTHER RESPONSES | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for January 9, 2026. Line 10.
DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR ISSUE SANCTIONS, MONETARY SANCTIONS AND ALTERNATIVELY, FURTHER RESPONSES is GRANTED as follows: (1) no later than January 16, 2026 Plaintiff to provide complete verified response by HOA members/unit owners impacted by solar gain overheating and cracking; and produce all documents that are identified in those responses, if any; and (2) for any unit/member that complete verified responses with production are not provided, issue sanctions are granted as reqeusted.
Monetary sanctions in the amount of $4,750 granted to Rohan, Wallace and Ahrene Inc and $3,500 to 121 Ninth LLC =(501/CFH)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).
Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”