| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Indexed | Hearing |
|---|
Motion For Order Deeming Admissions Admitted And For Sanctions Against Defendant Alina Redd
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25680450 - February 10, 2026 Hearing date: February 10, 2026 Case number: CUD25680450 Case title: 975 BRYANT STREET APARTMENT INVESTORS, L.L.C. VS. ALINA REDD ET AL Case Number: | | CUD25680450 | Case Title: | | 975 BRYANT STREET APARTMENT INVESTORS, L.L.C. VS. ALINA REDD ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-02-10 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion For Order Deeming Admissions Admitted And For Sanctions Against Defendant Alina Redd | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for February 10, 2026. Line 14.2.
PLAINTIFF 975 BRYANT STREET APARTMENT INVESTORS, L.L.C. Motion For Order Deeming Admissions Admitted And For Sanctions Against Defendant Alina Redd is GRANTED, subject to opposition. Truth of all matters in Plaintiff's Requests for Admissions to Defendant Alina Redd, Set One, served on January 13, 2026, are deemed admitted. Sanctions granted in the amount of $410. =(501/REQ)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).
Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”