Motion for Compliance
Defendant and all Cross-Defendants are grouped together in the FACC, such that Defendant Nieto’s role in the events and actions of this case are unclear. (See e.g., Williams v. Beechnut Nutrition Corp. (1986) 185 Cal.App.3d 135, 139, fn. 2 [when plaintiff joins multiple causes of action as one, fails to properly identify each cause of action, or fails to state against which party each cause of action is asserted if there are multiple defendants, complaint is uncertain.].)
An agreement between the parties to stipulate to Cross-Complainant filing a second amended cross- complaint that clearly delineates Cross-Defendant Nieto’s role and the basis for liability against Cross-Defendant Nieto may easily resolve some or all of the issues raised in the demurrer and/or motion to strike.
Therefore, the court will continue the demurrer and motion to strike and order that the parties meet and confer regarding the issues raised in the demurrer and motion to strike.
Cross-Defendant Nieto shall give notice of this ruling.
10 Motion to Amend 30-2024-01393270 Kenneth Craig Haase’s Motion for Leave to File Amended Answer was CONTINUED to May 26, Hodgson vs. Haase 2026 at 9:00 a.m. in Department N15 pursuant to the court’s orders issued May 7, 2026. (See ROA #251.)
11 Motion for Compliance
Defendant General Motors LLC’s Motion for Compliance Pursuant to C.C.P. § 871.26 is TAKEN Foley vs. General Motors, LLC OFF CALENDAR pursuant to the Request for Dismissal of the entire action of all parties and all causes of action filed April 20, 2026 (ROA #58).
12 Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel 30-2024-01424072 Counsel Anthony Werbin, Esq.’s Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel for Plaintiff Sergio Reyna Hernandez vs. Starbucks Hernandez is GRANTED/DENIED. Corporation
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”