DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
2022-01265727·orange·Civil·Discovery
Hearing about 2 months agoCONTINUED

Holland vs. South Orange County Community College District

Motion to Compel Further Responses to Special Interrogatories; Motion to Compel Production

Hearing date
Jul 27, 2026
Department
C11
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Aug 4, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Further Responses rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffHolland
DefendantSouth Orange County Community College District

Ruling

The Court will set a trial date at the OSC and CMC hearing.

Case Management Conference OSC re: Monetary Sanctions

5 Holland vs. South Orange County Community College District

2022-01265727 Motion to Compel Further Responses to Special Interrogatories Motion to Compel Production

Continued to August 4, 2026 at 1:30 p.m.

6 Lee vs. Rainone Enterprises, LLC

2025-01469318 Motion for Summary Judgment and/or Adjudication

Off Calendar 7 Lipton vs. Ooblix, Inc.

2025-01458340 Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel of Record

The unopposed motion by Callahan & Blaine, PC (“Counsel”), attorney of record for Defendant Ooblix, Inc. (“Ooblix”) for an order permitting counsel to be relieved as attorney of record for Ooblix in this action is GRANTED.

Counsel complied with CRC Rule 3.1362. Upon the signing of the revised order, Counsel shall serve the signed revised order on Ooblix and all parties who have appeared. The revised order granting relief shall be effective when proof of service of the signed revised order (including the future OSC for representation date of September 14, 2026 at 9:00 am) on Ooblix and all parties is filed with the Court.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share