DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CIVRS2502508·sanbernardino·Civil·Discovery Dispute
Hearing 4 months agoCONTINUED

Contreras v. American Honda

Motion to Compel Further responses to Form Interrogatories; Motion to Compel Further responses to Special Interrogatories

Hearing date
May 20, 2026
Department
R17
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
May 20, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Further Responses rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffContreras
DefendantAmerican Honda

Ruling

TENTATIVE RULINGS 5-20-26 Department R17- Judge Gilbert G. Ochoa

This court follows California Rules of Court, rule 3.1308(a) (1) for tentative rulings. (See San Bernardino Superior Court Local Emergency Rule 8.) Tentative rulings for each law & motion will be posted on the internet (https://www.sb-court.org) by 3:00 p.m. on the court day immediately before the hearing.

If you do not have internet access or if you experience difficulty with the posted tentative ruling, you may obtain the tentative ruling by calling the Administrative Assistant. You may appear in person at the hearing but personal appearance is not required and remote appearance by CourtCall is preferred during the Pandemic. (See www.sbcourt.org/general-information/remote-access)

If you wish to submit on the ruling, call the Court call the Court, check-in and state that you will be submitting on the Tentative, and your appearance is not necessary. But you must check in. If both sides do not appear, the tentative will simply become the ruling. If any party submits on the tentative, the Court will not alter the tentative and it will become the ruling. If one party wants to argue, Court will hear argument but will not change the tentative. If the Court does decide to modify tentative after argument, then a further hearing for oral argument will be reset for both parties to be heard at the same time by the Court. This procedure is meant to minimize your waiting time in Court.

Contreras v. American Honda

Motion- 1) MTC Further responses to Form Roggs 2)MTC Further responses Special Roggs

Movant- Def

Respondent- PLf

Ruling-

No formal memo is provided at this time on the above 2 Compel Further Motions (re Spec. & Form Rogs) due to Moving Party failed to engage in a meet and confer by telephone, teleconference, or in-person as required by CCP 2016.040(a). The matter will be continued so Defendant can comply with that requirement and file a declaration of that compliance at least 10 days before the continued hearing date. Clerk to set next available hearing date.

Movant to give notice.

Dated-

____________________________ Judge

Page | 9

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share