DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC24618593·sf·Civil·Partition of Real Property
Hearing about 2 months agoHearing Required. Parties shall submit supplemental briefs/declarations regarding proposed appraisers and valuation method; Defendant shall provide a proposed order for execution.

DIANA ZUNIGA VS. CARMEN A. GONZALEZ ET AL

Notice Of Motion And Motion To Determine Value, And Send Buyout Notice

Hearing date
Jul 24, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffDIANA ZUNIGA
DefendantCARMEN A. GONZALEZ

Ruling

Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for July 24, 2026. Line 3.1. DEFENDANT CARMEN GONZALEZ Notice Of Motion And Motion To Determine Value, And Send Buyout Notice Hearing Required.

This action shall proceed under the Partition of Real Property Act. No later than 9:00 a.m. on July 24, 2026 each party shall submit a supplemental brief/declaration including (1) at least 2 names of proposed appraisers each and (2) a statement whether the parties have agreed to the value of the property or other method of valuation (CCP 874.316(b)).

Depending on the supplemental briefs/declaration the Court will proceed in accordance with CCP 874.316(b) or (d). Defendant shall have a proposed order ready to be presented for execution at the hearing containing both alternative options described above. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share