Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment
repeatedly identify the property's correct street address, thereby reducing any potential for confusion regarding the premises at issue.
Accordingly, Defendants have not established that the alleged defects render the notice legally insufficient as a matter of law. The Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is therefore DENIED.
The Pretrial Conference of 7/31/2026 at 8:30 AM in Dept. C61 and Jury Trial of 8/3/2026 at 8:30 AM in Dept. C61 remain as calendared.
Plaintiff and Defendants are admonished to comply with Local Rule 317 as indicated in the 7/6/2026 Minute Order (ROA 46) regarding Jury documents and the requirement to meet and confer prior to the pretrial date to create joint documents as required under Local Rule 317, or the parties will be subject to sanctions under Local Rule 381.
The Court Clerk is to provide notice of the Court’s ruling.
15 30-2026-01564533 The Court has read and considered the Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Cooper Fellowship, Judgment (ROA 22) and Declaration in Support (ROA 20). Inc. vs. Bonner Under California Rules of Court, Rule 3.300(b) states “Whenever a party in a civil action knows or learns that the action or proceeding is related to another action or proceeding pending, dismissed, or disposed of by judgment in any state or federal court in California, the party must serve and file a Notice of Related Case.” Neither party in this matter has complied with Rule 3.300 as to the related case which is referenced in Exhibit 4 and Exhibit 5 of the Motion for Summary Judgment regarding the ongoing litigation regarding the Cooper Fellowship Inc. (Case No. 30-2026-01545367-CU-CO-CJC).
In the Defendant’s Answer, the Defendant disputes the Plaintiff’s authority to act on behalf of Cooper Fellowship Inc. The Court takes judicial notice that unlimited civil action in Case No. 30-2026-01545367-CU-CO-CJC is pending, which is litigating the lawful Board of Directors of Cooper Fellowship Inc., in which that Judicial Officer issued a preliminary injunction against Pal Lengyel-Leahu temporarily enjoining him from acting on behalf of Cooper Fellowship. As the matter is not fully litigated and there is no final order of the Court, the Court finds that there is a material issue in dispute as to whether the Plaintiff has legal standing to evict Ms. Bonner in this unlawful detainer action.
Therefore, the Court DENIES the Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment.
The Court Clerk is to give notice of the Court’s ruling. 16 30-2026-01577309 The Court has read and considered Defendant’s Motion for Order Deeming Yang vs. Byun Requests for Admissions, Set One, Admitted (ROA 13).
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
IT IS ORDERED that the Defendant's Motion to Deem Requests for Admissions, Set One, Admitted is granted and that the truth of all specified matters, and the genuineness of all specified documents, in the First Set of Requests for Admission, propounded by Defendant and served on Plaintiff