DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
24CV085335·alameda·Civil·Complex Case Designation
Hearing about 2 months agoDENIED

WILLIAMSON vs BACO REALTY CORPORATION, et al.

MOTION FOR COMPLEX CASE RULE DESIGNATION PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA RULES OF COURT, RULES 3.400 AND 3.403(b), AND ALAMEDA COUNTY LOCAL 3.250(a)

Hearing date
Jul 23, 2026
Department
15
Prevailing
Defendant

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffMelissa Williamson
DefendantBACO REALTY CORPORATION

Ruling

24CV085335: WILLIAMSON vs BACO REALTY CORPORATION, et al. 07/23/2026 Hearing on Motion for Order MOTION FOR COMPLEX CASE RULE DESIGNATION PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA RULES OF COURT, RULES 3.400 AND 3.403(b), AND ALAMEDA COUNTY LOCAL 3.250(a); filed by Melissa Williamson (Plaintiff) CRS# 086732681330 in Department 15

Tentative Ruling - 07/21/2026 Peter Borkon

The Motion re: PLAINTIFFS NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR COMPLEX CASE RULE DESIGNATION PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA RULES OF COURT, RULES 3.400 AND 3.403(b), AND ALAMEDA COUNTY LOCAL 3.250(a); MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES filed by Melissa Williamson on 06/08/2026 is Denied.

The Court does not designate this case as complex. Any complex fees paid for or by the parties prior to the order shall be reimbursed in the amount paid pursuant to Government Code Section 70616(c)

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share