DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
24CV060514·alameda·Civil·Case Management
Hearing about 2 months agoThe Court sets trial for 10/26/2026 and the pretrial conference for 10/14/2026.

JT2 INTEGRATED RESOURCES - CITY OF OAKLAND vs SMITH

Case Management Conference

Hearing date
Jul 23, 2026
Department
517
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Oct 26, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffJT2 INTEGRATED RESOURCES - CITY OF OAKLAND
DefendantSMITH

Ruling

24CV060514: JT2 INTEGRATED RESOURCES - CITY OF OAKLAND vs SMITH 07/23/2026 Case Management Conference in Department 517

Tentative Ruling - 07/13/2026 Keith Fong

APPEARANCES REQUIRED. At the prior hearing on 5/19/2026, the parties indicated that the dispute should be entirely resolved shortly. Neither Case Management Statement provides the Court with any information regarding whether the dispute has been resolved nor has a request for dismissal been filed. The Court indicated that it would set the matter for trial within 60 days absent a request for dismissal. Accordingly, the Court sets trial for 10/26/2026 and the pretrial conference for 10/14/2026.

ZOOM LOG-IN INFORMATION FOR DEPARTMENT 517 IS BELOW.

Join ZoomGov Meeting https://www.zoomgov.com/j/16181989812

Meeting ID: 161 8198 9812 One tap mobile +16692545252,,16181989812# US (San Jose) 16692161590,,16181989812# US +(San Jose)

IF APPEARING BY ZOOM, VIDEO MUST BE ENABLED. THE COURT DOES NOT ALLOW APPEARANCES BY PHONE WITHOUT PRIOR LEAVE OF COURT.

Dial by your location +1 669 254 5252 US (San Jose) +1 669 216 1590 US (San Jose) +1 551 285 1373 US +1 646 828 7666 US (New York) 833 568 8864 US Toll-free Meeting ID: 161 8198 9812 Find your local number: https://www.zoomgov.com/u/ad6x1ZH23d

Join by SIP 16181989812@sip.zoomgov.com

Join by H.323 161.199.138.10 (US West) 161.199.136.10 (US East) Meeting ID: 161 8198 9812

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share