DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CV0001349·marin·Civil·Motion to Relieve Counsel
Hearing about 2 months agoUnclear

LEE HENRY GREENBERG vs. RONNIE BAKER, ET AL

Motion to Relieve Counsel

Hearing date
Jul 22, 2026
Department
H
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffLEE HENRY GREENBERG
DefendantRONNIE BAKER
DefendantANGELA BEASLEY BAKER

Ruling

Counsel for Robbie Baker and Angela Beasley Baker filed a motion to be relieved as counsel. Counsel’s declaration indicates he has been unable to contact the client as he has been evicted from the premises and does not have a forwarding address. However, it is unclear whether the lack of notice pertains to both Robbie Baker and Angela Baker.

Appearances required.

All parties must comply with Marin County Superior Court Local Rules, Rule 2.10(B) to contest the tentative decision. Parties who request oral argument are required to appear in person or remotely by ZOOM. Regardless of whether a party requests oral argument in accordance with Rule 2.10(B), the prevailing party shall prepare an order consistent with the announced ruling as required by Marin County Superior Court Local Rules, Rule 2.11.

The Zoom appearance information for July, 2026 is as follows: https://marin-courts-ca-gov.zoomgov.com/j/1615487764?pwd=Ob4B5J7LLKcpnkxzJjjEOSHNzEGafG.1

Meeting ID: 161 548 7764 Passcode: 502070

If you are unable to join by video, you may join by telephone by calling (669) 254-5252 and using the above-provided passcode. Zoom appearance information may also be found on the Court’s website: https://www.marin.courts.ca.gov

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share