DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
3·orange·Civil·Civil
Hearing about 2 months agoGRANTED

Tran vs. Studio RSR

Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel of Record (x3)

Hearing date
Jul 17, 2026
Department
W8
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

DefendantSTUDIO RSR
DefendantROBERT ROBLES
DefendantRSR DESIGN GROUP LLC

Attorneys

KAVEH NEWMEN(NEWMEN LAW)for Defendant

Ruling

The declaration filed in support of the motion states that a “copy of the proof of service [showing personal service on the client] will be filed with the court at least 5 days before hearing.” (Decl. in Support, ¶ 3(a)(1) [ROA 26].) No such proof of service has been filed.

The deadline to file a proof of service has passed. Rule 3.1300(c) of the California Rules of Court requires that a proof of service of the moving papers be filed with the court no later than five court days before the date set for hearing. That deadline passed on 7/10/26.

Moving Attorney to give notice.

3 Tran vs. Studio RSR Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel of Record (x3)

The court GRANTS attorney KAVEH NEWMEN’s (of NEWMEN LAW) unopposed Motions to Be Relieved as Counsel for Defendants (1) STUDIO RSR, (2) ROBERT ROBLES, and (3) RSR DESIGN GROUP LLC.

The court finds moving attorney meets the requirements set forth in Rule 3.1362 of the California Rules of Court.

The orders shall not become effective until the filing of a proof of service showing service of the order on the client.

Moving attorney to give notice and file proof(s) of service within 14 days.

7 Ernesto Rojas Motion to Determine Fair Market Value, etc. trustee of The (Status Conference) Rojas Living Trust Dated August 2021 1. Motion to Determine Fair Market Value, Etc. vs. All persons unknown, claiming No Tentative. The referee and parties should be prepared any legal or to discuss the following at the hearing: equitable right, etc. Court-Appointed Partition Referee LUIS GALLEGOS moves pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Sections 874.311 et

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share