Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel of Record x 3
104 Vo vs. Silva Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel of Record x 3
Matthew P. Cortez (“Moving Attorney”) moves to be relieved as counsel of record for (1) Defendant Jorge Perez De Tagle, (2) Defendant Quantum Global Health, Inc., and (3) Defendant La Vida Health & Wellness Center of Garden Grove
The motions are unopposed. Moving Attorney has stated a basis for permissive withdrawal under the Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 1.16. The motion satisfies the notice, declaration, and proposed order requirements of Cal. Rules of Court, Rule 3.1362
The Counsel to update and submit order (MC-053) for the Court’s signature.
The order relieving counsel will be effective upon counsel filing proof of service of a copy of the signed order (MC-053) on the clients and on all parties that have appeared in the case. (California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1362(e).)
The motions are GRANTED.
Moving Attorney to give notice.
105 McClane vs Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel of Record Mofrad
24- 01370248 JONATHAN COLEMAN seeks an order relieving him from acting as counsel of record for Plaintiff Michael Mcclane.
Motions to be relieved as counsel pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure § 284(2) are governed by California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1362.
All the requirements of California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1362 have been met, and the Declaration of Attorney Jonathan Coleman appears to demonstrate good cause for granting the motion based on the allegations that:
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”