OTHER REVIEW HEARING
1 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 4
5) 6 NORA JIMENEZ,) Case Number: FDV-23-816714) 7 Petitioner) Hearing Date: July 14, 2026) 8 VS.) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM) 9 PEDRO CARLOS CHABLE,) Department: 403) 10 Respondent) Presiding: BOBBY P. LUNA) 11) 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING 13 TENTATIVE RULING 14 Having read and considered the pleadings, declarations, and other evidence submitted in this matter, the 15 Court makes the following findings and orders: 16 A. Procedural History 17 1) The matter was before this Court on December 9, 2025. On that date the Court made the 18 following orders: 19 a.
The DVRO filed 07/21/23 shall be amended to remove minor child, Amishai Chable 20 Jiminez as a protected party. 21 b. Commencing Saturday, December 13, 2025, from Noon-2:00 p.m., Amishai shall have 22 unsupervised visits with Respondent, Pedro Chable. 23 c. The Respondent shall choose an individual therapist for the weekly therapy for the minor 24 child, Issac Chable Jimenez. The Petitioner shall transport Issac to his weekly individual 25 therapy, which shall commence forthwith. Amishai shall continue with her induvial 26 therapy with her Kaiser therapist. 27 d.
The previously ordered 2-hour weekly weekend supervised visits through Bridging 28 Families between the Respondent and Issac shall remain a court order. 29
1 e. The previously ordered weekly Family Therapy with Dr. Timothy Englemann with both 2 children and the Respondent shall remain a court order. 3 f. The Petitioner shall be cooperative with the therapies and visitations. If Petitioner causes 4 any further delays in the therapies or visits or both, the court will order consequences to 5 Petitioner in the children’s best interests. In the event mother remains uncooperative, 6 father may file an ex parte application for emergency orders. 7 g. Matter continued to February 3, 2026 at 9:00 a.m., for review of therapies and visits. 8 2) On February 3, 2026, the Court issued the following relevant orders: 9 a.
The Court continued the matter to April 16, 2026 for review of further progress and step 10 ups in Father’s visitation time and Mother’s lack of cooperation. 11 b. Mr. Sheets shall continue as Minor’s Counsel. 12 c. All other orders shall remain in full force and effect. 13 3) On April 16, 2026, the Court made the following several orders, the most relevant to this 14 proceeding being: 15 a. Commencing April 16, 2026, Respondent, PEDRO CARLOS CHABLE shall have full 16 and sole PHYSICAL CUSTODY and full and sole LEGAL CUSTODY of the minor 17 child, ISSAC CHAMBLE JIMENEZ 18 b.
Law enforcement may assist Respondent in retrieving ISSAC CHABLE JIMENEZ from 19 the Petitioner 20 c. The Petitioner, NORA LIZZETH JIMENEZ MOLINERO shall have no visitation with 21 ISSACC CHABLE JIMENEZ, pending further court order. 22 d. Commencing, April,16, 2026, Respondent, shall have the minor child, AMISHAI 23 CHAMBLE JIMENEZ (DOB: 04/03/2011) each and every weekend, from Saturday at 24 10:00 am through Sunday at 6:00 pm. Within the visitation timeframe of Saturday 25 10:00am though Sunday 6:00pm., AMISHAI and Respondent shall mutually agree upon 26 the times, duration and frequency. 27 e.
The Respondent and Petitioner shall have JOINT LEGA CUSTODY of AMISHAI 28 f. Ryan Sheet shall continue as Minor’s Counsel. 29
1 g. This matter is continued for a review hearing on July 14, 2026 at 9:00am in Department 2 403. All updates shall be timely served and filled. 3 h. All other orders in direct conflict with these orders remain in full force and effect. 4 4) On June 25, 2026, Mother filed “Petitioner’s Update Declaration re: Resumption of Visitation 5 with Both our Children,” which has been read and considered by the Court. 6 5) On July 7, 2026, Father filed “Respondent’s Status Update,” which has been read and considered 7 by the Court. 8 6) On July 6, 2026, Minor’s Counsel, Mr.
Sheets, filed a “Minors’ Counsel’s Statement for July 14, 9 2026 Review Hearing,” which has been read and considered by the Court. 10 B. Findings and Order 11 1) All existing orders shall remain in full force and effect as no additional information was 12 submitted to the Court. 13 2) Should either party seek modification of the existing orders, they shall file and serve a new 14 Request for Order. 15 3) The order appointing minor’s counsel, Ryan Sheets, is hereby terminated. 16 4) The Court will prepare the Findings and Order After Hearing. 17
21
25
29
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”