Motion to Compel Initial Responses to Requests for Production; Request for Sanctions
July 13, 2026 LAW AND MOTION CALENDAR PAGE 17 Judge: HONORABLE DAVID A. SILBERMAN, DEPARTMENT 11 ________________________________________________________________________
02:00 PM 24-CIV-08298 FABIOLA BARAJAS LOZANO VS. FCA US, LLC., ET AL. LINE 6
FABIOLA BARAJAS LOZANO LARRY W. CHAE FCA US, LLC. BRADFORD G. HUGHES
DEFENDANT: FCA US, LLC’S MOTION TO COMPEL PLAINTIFF FABIOLA BARAJAS LOZANOS INTITAL RESPONSES TO DEFENDANTS REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS, SET ONE (1) AND REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS IN THE AMOUNT OF $608.00
TENTATIVE RULING:
The unopposed motion is granted. Plaintiff shall serve verified responses, without objection, to defendant’s Request for Production of Documents, Set One, within 14 days. The request for sanctions is also granted. Plaintiff shall pay defendant $368 ($148 plus $160 plus $60) within 30 days.
Any party who contests a tentative ruling must email Dept.11@sanmateocourt.org with a copy to all other parties by 4:00 p.m. stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests.
If the tentative ruling is uncontested, it shall become the order of the Court. Thereafter, counsel for the prevailing party shall prepare for the Court’s signature a written order consistent with the Court’s ruling pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 3.1312 and provide written notice of the ruling to all parties who have appeared in the action, as required by law and by the California Rules of Court. Please note that Local Rule 3.403(b)(iv) states in part “prevailing party on a tentative ruling is required to prepare a proposed order REPEATING VERBATIM the tentative ruling” (emphasis added). The order should be efiled only, do not email or mail a hard copy to the Court.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”