MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD26681239 - July 6, 2026 Hearing date: July 6, 2026 Case number: CUD26681239 Case title: 3122 SACRAMENTO STREET, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED VS. ISABELLA CARRASCO ET AL Case Number: | | CUD26681239 | Case Title: | | 3122 SACRAMENTO STREET, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED VS. ISABELLA CARRASCO ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-07-06 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for July 6, 2026. Line 6.
PLAINTIFF 3122 SACRAMENTO STREET, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT is DENIED. Triable issues of material fact exist, including issues regarding Defendant's habitability defense and the whether the Three-Day Notice to Pay Rent or Quit overstated the amount of rent due.=(501/CFH)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).
Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”