Hearing in 2 daysOff calendar. No proof of service and not timely filed in compliance with Code of Civil Procedure, section 1005, subdivision (b). In addition, a motion for leave to amend must comply with Rule of Court 3.1324.

GARY M WAITE VS. EDWARD M HIGGINBOTHAM

Print-friendly view

Motion For Leave To Amend

Hearing date

Jun 29, 2026

Department

301

Judge

Christine Van Aken

Prevailing

N/A

Appearance

Not required

Motion type

Other

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffGARY M WAITE

DefendantEDWARD M HIGGINBOTHAM

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Law & Motion / Discovery Dept 301 - CGC25625609 - June 29, 2026 Hearing date: June 29, 2026 Case number: CGC25625609 Case title: GARY M WAITE VS. EDWARD M HIGGINBOTHAM Case Number: | | CGC25625609 | Case Title: | | GARY M WAITE VS. EDWARD M HIGGINBOTHAM | Court Date: | | 2026-06-29 09:00 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Motion For Leave To Amend | Rulings: | | On the Law & Motion/Discovery calendar for Monday, June 29, 2026, Line 4, PLAINTIFF GARY WAITE'S Motion For Leave To Amend. Off calendar. No proof of service and not timely filed in compliance with Code of Civil Procedure, section 1005, subdivision (b). In addition, a motion for leave to amend must comply with Rule of Court 3.1324. =(301/CVA) | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…

Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Other rulings by Christine Van Aken Judge Christine Van Aken dossier Other Other in SF All SF County rulings Other Civil cases

Related rulings

by semantic similarity

Source

Print-friendly view