DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC23610891·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing 11 months agoOff calendar, insufficient notice.

SARAH LEWIS VS. KENNETH RUNYON ET AL

Notice Of Motion And Motion For Relief Pursuant To Ccp 473(B) And, In The Alternative, For Leave To Amend The Second Amended Complaint Pursuant To Ccp 473(A)(1) And Crc 3.1324

Hearing date
Sep 29, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffSARAH LEWIS
DefendantKENNETH RUNYON

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC23610891 - September 29, 2025 Hearing date: September 29, 2025 Case number: CGC23610891 Case title: SARAH LEWIS VS. KENNETH RUNYON ET AL Case Number: | | CGC23610891 | Case Title: | | SARAH LEWIS VS. KENNETH RUNYON ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-09-29 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion For Relief Pursuant To Ccp 473(B) And, In The Alternative, For Leave To Amend The Second Amended Complaint Pursuant To Ccp 473(A)(1) And Crc 3.1324 | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court motion calendar for September 29, 2025, line 14.

PLAINTIFF SARAH LEWIS Motion For Relief Pursuant To CCP 473(B) And, In The Alternative, For Leave To Amend The Second Amended Complaint Pursuant To CCP 473(A)(1) And CRC 3.1324. Off calendar, insufficient notice. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom [Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252].

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests.

A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share