DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC23609981·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing 10 months agoOFF CALENDAR. Insufficient notice per CCP 1005 and 1010.6.

THOMAS A. KARAS ET AL VS. ANDREAS ANGELOPOULOS ET AL

Notice Of Motion And Motion For Leave To Amend Complaint

Hearing date
Oct 21, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffTHOMAS KARAS AS TRUSTEE OF THE THOMAS A. KARAS AND ELENI KARAS REVOCABLE TRUST DATED 7/10/2014
PlaintiffELENI KARAS
DefendantANDREAS ANGELOPOULOS

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC23609981 - October 21, 2025 Hearing date: October 21, 2025 Case number: CGC23609981 Case title: THOMAS A. KARAS ET AL VS. ANDREAS ANGELOPOULOS ET AL Case Number: | | CGC23609981 | Case Title: | | THOMAS A. KARAS ET AL VS. ANDREAS ANGELOPOULOS ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-10-21 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion For Leave To Amend Complaint | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for October 21, 2025. Line 3.

PLAINTIFF THOMAS KARAS AS TRUSTEE OF THE THOMAS A. KARAS AND ELENI KARAS REVOCABLE TRUST DATED 7/10/2014, ELENI KARAS Notice Of Motion And Motion For Leave To Amend Complaint is OFF CALENDAR. Insufficient notice per CCP 1005 and 1010.6. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share