Motion for Summary Adjudication
Browse all Motion for Summary Adjudication rulings statewide →
34-2023-00333876-CU-WT-GDS: Ryan Crowley vs. California Correctional Health Care Services 06/15/2026 Hearing on Motion for Summary Adjudication in Department 8C
Tentative Ruling
NOTICE:
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that any oral arguments regarding this tentative ruling will be heard at 1:30 p.m. in Department 8C, located at the Tani G. Cantil-Sakauye Courthouse located at 500 G. Street, Sacramento, CA, the Hon. Richard C. Miadich presiding.
Any party who wishes to contest the tentative ruling below must:
(1) request a hearing by calling the Law and Motion Oral Argument Request Line at (916) 874-2615, by 4:00 p.m. the Court day before the noticed hearing date, and leave a voicemail message (a) identifying themselves as the party requesting oral argument; (b) indicating the specific matter/motion for which they are requesting oral argument; and (c) confirming that they have notified the opposing party of their intention to appear; and
(2) advise the opposing party of the location and time of hearing pursuant to Local Rule 1.06.
If a hearing is not requested by 4:00 p.m. on the Court day before the noticed hearing date, the tentative ruling will become the final order of the Court.
If a hearing is requested, the Court prefers in-person attendance by the parties. However, parties may appear by Zoom unless the Court specifically orders in-person attendance. Parties choosing to appear by Zoom are reminded, however, that a Zoom appearance is still a formal appearance before the Court. Parties appearing via Zoom should do so from a quiet location, free from undue distractions, and wear attire suitable for an in-person court appearance.
The parties may join the Zoom session for hearing on the tentative ruling by audio and/or video through the following link:
https://saccourt-ca-gov.zoomgov.com/j/16039062174
SIP Address:
16039062174@sip.zoomgov.com
(833) 568-8864
34-2023-00333876-CU-WT-GDS: Ryan Crowley vs. California Correctional Health Care Services 06/15/2026 Hearing on Motion for Summary Adjudication in Department 8C
ID: 16039062174
Parties requesting services of a court reporter will need to arrange for private court reporter services at their own expense, pursuant to
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
A Stipulation and Appointment of Official Reporter Pro Tempore (CV/E-206) is required to be signed by each party, the private court reporter, and the Judge prior to the hearing, if not using a reporter from the Courts Approved Official Reporter Pro Tempore list.
Once the form is signed it must be filed with the clerk. If a litigant has been granted a fee waiver and requests a court reporter, the party must submit a Request for Court Reporter by a Party with a Fee Waiver (CV/E-211) and it must be filed with the clerk at least 10 days prior to the hearing or at the time the proceeding is scheduled if less than 10 days away. Once approved, the clerk will be forward the form to the Court Reporters Office and an official reporter will be provided.
TENTATIVE RULING
***NOTICE: EFFECTIVE APRIL 13, 2026, THIS DEPARTMENT HAS MOVED TO THE TANI G. CANTIL-SAKAUYE COURTHOUSE LOCATED AT 500 G. ST. SACRAMENTO, CA. ALL MOTIONS NOTICED FOR DEPARTMENT 28 WILL BE HEARD IN DEPARTMENT 8C OF THE NEW COURTHOUSE. ALL PAPERS FOR THIS DEPARTMENT MUST BE FILED AT THIS NEW LOCATION AND WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED AT THE HALL OF JUSTICE. ALL HEARINGS WILL TAKE PLACE AT THIS NEW LOCATION****
This matter is DROPPED for defective notice.
Code of Civil Procedure section 437c(a)(2) requires that notice of a motion for summary judgment be served on all other parties to the action at least 81 days before the time appointed for hearing. (Code Civ. Proc. § 437c(a)(2).) A motion for summary adjudication . . . shall proceed in all procedural respects as a motion for summary judgment. (Code Civ. Proc.
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO
34-2023-00333876-CU-WT-GDS: Ryan Crowley vs. California Correctional Health Care Services 06/15/2026 Hearing on Motion for Summary Adjudication in Department 8C
437c(f)(2).)
Here, Defendant provided only 47 days notice by filing the Motion on April 29, 2026 and having it set for hearing on June 15, 2026.
As a result, notice was defective.
Defective notice deprives the Court of jurisdiction to act. (Lee v. Placer Title Co. (1994) 28 Cal. App. 4th 503, 509, 511.)
The minute order is effective immediately. No formal order pursuant to CRC Rule 3.1312 or further notice is required.