Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement CCP 664.6
1. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME AMERICAN CVRI2202721 RENEWABLE ENERGY, MOTION TO VACATE DISMISSAL INC. VS TONOYAN Tentative Ruling:
On December 4, 2024, the order of dismissal was entered, and notice was given. The motion is denied.
2. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME COMMERCIAL MOTION TO ENFORCE CLEANING SOLUTIONS, CVRI2304960 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT CCP INC. VS SALEEN 664.6 AUTOMOTIVE Tentative Ruling:
The unopposed motion is granted.
3. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME MOTION FOR ORDER TO DEEM MATTERS ADMITTED RFA SET ONE NOS. 1–16
LICEA VS WALMART, CVRI2407207 MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER INC. RESPONSES TO SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES AND REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS, AND FOR MONETARY SANCTIONS Tentative Ruling:
Plaintiff’s efforts to meet and confer were reasonable and in good faith.
Timeliness
The motion for order to compel further responses must be served within 45 days of service of verified responses, plus the additional time if not personally served. (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 2030.300, subd. (c), 1010.6, subd. (a)(4); 1013.) If the responses are objections only, they are treated as verified responses with respect to the 45-day limit, but if the responses are a combination of both unverified responses and objections then
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”