MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL FOR MICHAEL MORALES
1. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS CVRI2500385 AGUAYO VS MORALES COUNSEL FOR MICHAEL MORALES Tentative Ruling:
GRANT
2. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME CVRI2500799 GONG VS YAZDANI DEMURRER ON COMPLAINT Tentative Ruling:
OVERRULE the demurrer.
Defendant to Answer within 20 days.
Plaintiff has sufficiently alleged a cause of action for trespass. On demurrer, the court takes all of Plaintiff’s allegations as true. Here, the easement that is allegedly being infringed upon has been described as appurtenant, servient, non-exclusive and public. Defendant’s arguments seeking a declaration of the easement rights and burdens of the parties is more properly addressed in a Motion on the Pleadings or a Motion for Summary Adjudication. Defendant cannot state that the Complaint is so insufficient that Defendant does not have a clear understanding of the allegations against it so as to file an Answer and conduct discovery in the matter.
3. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME MOTION TO COMPEL PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSES, WITHOUT CARONNA VS OBJECTIONS, TO SPECIAL CVRI2504126 CALIFORNIA BAPTIST INTERROGATORIES (SET ONE) UNIVERSITY AND REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS IN THE AMOUNT OF $3,210.00 Tentative Ruling:
DENY
Defendant has indicated that she has served supplemental, code compliant responses to the special interrogatories. This motion to compel is therefore moot. If Plaintiff is
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”