DecisionDepot
California legal research
All judges

Jennifer K. Rockwell

SACRAMENTO · 11 rulings ingested

Ruling distribution
11
rulings
Granted45%
Denied18%
Continued9%
Other27%
Prevailing party
6
determined
Plaintiff17%
Defendant67%
Mixed17%
At a glance
Grant rate45%
Denial rate18%
Continuance rate9%
First seenMay 12, 2025
Most recentAug 20, 2026

Motion type breakdown

Other
5
Demurrer
2
Petition
2
Motion to Compel Discovery
1
Ex Parte Application
1
Granted
Denied
Continued
Other

Recent rulings

CaseCountyMotionRulingIndexedHearing
26WM000206
FRAN SDAO v. SHIRLEY N. WEBER, PH.D., et al.
sacramento
Civil
Petition for Writ of MandateGRANTEDAug 20, 2026Aug 20, 2026
26WM000102
TYSON vs DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL PROTECTION AND INNOVATION
sacramento
Civil
Petition for Writ of MandateDENIEDAug 20, 2026Aug 20, 2026
25WM000228
HERNANDEZ vs CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, et al.
sacramento
Civil
Motion for Discovery of Peace Officer Personnel Records (Pitchess Motion)GRANTED in part, DENIED in part. CDCR shall disclose the Criminal Report NV-SCC040-24-C, with officer names other than Petitioner’s redacted, subject to a protective order.Aug 13, 2026Aug 13, 2026
25WM000228
JAIME HERNANDEZ v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, et al.
sacramento
Civil
Motion for Discovery of Peace Officer Personnel Records (Pitchess Motion)CONTINUEDAug 13, 2026Jul 9, 2026
25WM000052
GLOBAL TEL*LINK CORPORATION vs CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, et al.
sacramento
Civil
Petitioner’s Motion for Protective OrderGRANTEDMay 28, 2026May 28, 2026
25WM000052
GLOBAL TEL*LINK CORPORATION vs CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, et al.
sacramento
Civil
Petitioner’s Motion to CompelDENIEDMay 28, 2026May 28, 2026
25WM000052
GLOBAL TEL*LINK CORPORATION vs CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, et al.
sacramento
Civil
MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDERGRANTEDMay 28, 2026May 28, 2026
25WM000152
SANDFORD vs DMV
sacramento
Civil
Demurrer – Second Amended PetitionThe demurrer to the First and Second Causes of Action is sustained with leave to amend. The demurrer to the remaining causes of action is sustained without leave to amend.Jul 16, 2026Apr 13, 2026
25WM000152
SANDFORD vs DMV
sacramento
Civil
DemurrerThe demurrer is sustained on the grounds that the Petition is an improper collateral attack on Petitioner’s criminal convictions. The demurrer is otherwise overruled. Leave to amend is granted.Jul 16, 2026Jan 12, 2026
25WM000228
JAIME HERNANDEZ v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, et al.
sacramento
Civil
Ex Parte Application for StayAppearance required.Aug 13, 2026Jan 12, 2026
25WM000052
GLOBAL TEL*LINK CORPORATION v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, ET AL.
sacramento
Civil
Applications for Admission Pro Hac ViceGRANTEDMay 28, 2026May 12, 2025

Frequently asked questions

What is Judge Jennifer K. Rockwell's grant rate in California Superior Court?+

Based on 11 tentative rulings indexed by DecisionDepot, Judge Jennifer K. Rockwell has a 45% grant rate (18% denial rate, 9% continued). Counties active: SACRAMENTO.

What kinds of motions does Judge Jennifer K. Rockwell hear most often?+

The most common motion type in Judge Jennifer K. Rockwell's indexed rulings is Other. The full motion-type breakdown appears on this page — each motion type shows grant, denial, and continuance counts so practitioners can prepare accordingly.