DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
24CV066869·alameda·Civil·Civil
Hearing 3 months agoCONTINUED

MA v. SUSHI GO GO, A CALIFORNIA GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, et al.

Demurrer

Hearing date
Jun 11, 2026
Department
520
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Jul 10, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Demurrer rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffMA
DefendantSUSHI GO GO, A CALIFORNIA GENERAL PARTNERSHIP
DefendantSteve Jian Li

Attorneys

Steve Jian Lifor Defendant

Ruling

24CV066869: MA vs SUSHI GO GO, A CALIFORNIA GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, et al. 06/11/2026 Hearing on Demurrer Demurrer; filed by Steve Jian Li (Defendant) CRS# 522145745772 in Department 520

Tentative Ruling - 06/10/2026 Jamilah A. Jefferson

Demurrer is CONTINUED TO July 10, 2026 to be heard with continued motion to modify protective order.

The Hearing on Demurrer Demurrer; filed by Steve Jian Li (Defendant) CRS# 522145745772 scheduled for 06/11/2026 is continued to 07/10/2026 at 10:00 AM in Department 520 at Hayward Hall of Justice.

NOTICE: This tentative ruling will automatically become the court’s final order on June 11, 2026 unless, by no later than 5:00 P.M. on June 10, 2026, a party to the action notifies BOTH: 1) the court by emailing Dept520@alameda.courts.ca.gov; AND 2) all opposing counsel or selfrepresented parties (by telephone or email) that the party is contesting this tentative ruling.

The subject line (RE:) of the email must state: “Request for CONTESTED HEARING: [the case name], [number].” When a party emails to contest a tentative ruling, the party must identify the specific holding(s) within the ruling they wish to contest via oral argument.

The court does not provide court reporters for hearings in civil departments. A party who wants a record of the proceedings must engage a private court reporter. (Local Rule 3.95.) Any privately retained court reporter must also participate via video conference. Their email must be provided to the court at the time the Notice of Contest is emailed.

ALL CONTESTED LAW AND MOTION HEARINGS ARE CONDUCTED VIA REMOTE VIDEO unless an in person appearance is required by the court. Invitations to participate in the video proceeding will be sent by the court upon receipt of timely notice of contest. A party may give email notice that they will appear in court in person for the hearing, however all other counsel/parties and the JUDGE MAY APPEAR REMOTELY.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share