Kakar v. Ford Motor Company
Motion for attorney’s fees
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
Case: Kakar v. Ford Motor Company Case No. CV2024-3284 Hearing Date: June 11, 2026 Department Fourteen 9:00 a.m.
Plaintiff Farida Kakar’s motion for attorney’s fees for time actually expended and reasonably incurred is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (Civ. Code, § 1794, subd. (d).) Plaintiff failed to provide timely notice of the hearing date and time to defendant. (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 1010, 1005, subd. (b); Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1110(b); Bohn v. Bohn (1913) 164 Cal. 532, 536-537; see also Notice of motion, p. 1; Opposition, p. 11.)
The notice of motion does not provide notice of this Court’s tentative ruling system as required by Local Rule 11.2(b). Counsel for moving party, or the moving party if unrepresented by counsel, is ordered to notify the opposing party or parties immediately of the tentative ruling system.
If no hearing is requested, and no party appears at the hearing, this tentative ruling is effective immediately. No formal order pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 3.1312 or further notice is required.
4 of 5
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”