DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CVPS2507743·riverside·Probate·Contract
Hearing todayNo tentative ruling. The motion does not comply with Local Rule 3316C.

CITIBANK, N.A. VS VARGAS

MOTION FOR STIPULATED JUDGMENT

Hearing date
Aug 27, 2026
Department
PS4
Judge
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffCITIBANK, N.A.
DefendantVARGAS

Ruling

1. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME CITIBANK, N.A. VS MOTION FOR STIPULATED JUDGMENT

VARGAS BY CITIBANK, N.A. Tentative Ruling: No tentative ruling. The motion does not comply with Local Rule 3316C. Parties wishing to argue the motion are ordered to appear. Appearance may be telephonic.

2. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME MOTION FOR ORDER TO DEEM WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. CVPS2509394 MATTERS ADMITTED BY WELLS VS CARIAS FARGO BANK, N.A. Tentative Ruling: Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.’s unopposed motion for an order deeming matters admitted is GRANTED. Requests 1 through 11, inclusive, in plaintiff’s requests for admissions are deemed admitted for all purposes in this litigation.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share