DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CVPS2603552·riverside·Probate·Petition to Compel Arbitration
Hearing 3 months agoCONTINUED

KINDEL VS INTERINSURANCE EXCHANGE OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA

Hearing on Petition to Compel Arbitration

Hearing date
Jun 11, 2026
Department
PS1
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Jul 27, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffKindel
DefendantInterinsurance Exchange of Southern California

Ruling

4. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME MOTION TO COMPEL ENRIQUE TIRA TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS AND PROVIDE A VERIFIED WRITTEN CVPS2501702 CARRERA VS GONZALEZ RESPONSE, AND FOR SANCTIONS AGAINST ENRIQUE TIRA, IN THE AMOUNT OF $3,429.75 BY CARISSA CARRERA Tentative Ruling: No tentative ruling. Hearing continued to June 25, 2026 to be heard with other motions.

5. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER DEPOSITION TESTIMONY OF WITNESS KARINA VEGA, AND FOR MONETARY SANCTIONS AGAINST CVPS2501702 CARRERA VS GONZALEZ DEFENDANT CVUSD, AND/OR ATTORNEY RANDALL WINE; AND TO PREVENT CVUSD'S ATTORNEY FROM REPRESENTING MS. VEGA DUE TO A CONFLICT OF INTEREST Tentative Ruling: No tentative ruling. Hearing continued to June 25, 2026 to be heard with other motions.

6. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME KINDEL VS INTERINSURANCE HEARING ON PETITION TO COMPEL

EXCHANGE OF SOUTHERN ARBITRATION CALIFORNIA Tentative Ruling: No tentative ruling, hearing continued to July 27, 2026 as time for Respondent to file a response has not run.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share