DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
24CV433661·santaclara·Civil·Debt collection/Wage garnishment
Hearing 3 months agoDenied in part and granted in part

LVNV Funding, LLC v. Mein Nguyen

Claim of exemption

Hearing date
Jun 4, 2026
Department
10
Prevailing
Mixed

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$164.35

Parties

PlaintiffLVNV Funding, LLC
DefendantMein Nguyen

Ruling

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 10 Honorable Jeffrey B. El-Hajj Blanca Than, Courtroom Clerk 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: 408-882-2210

DATE: June 4, 2026 TIME: 9:00 A.M. / 9:01 A.M. To contest the ruling, call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 P.M. Make sure to let the other side know before 4:00 P.M. that you plan to contest the ruling. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1308(a)(1); Local Rule 8.D.)

**Please specify the issue to be contested when calling the Court and counsel**

Line 5 25CV460436 Fang Xia v. Park Click LINE 5 or scroll down for ruling. Townsend Homeowners Association Line 6 25CV460436 Fang Xia v. Park Click LINE 5 or scroll down for ruling. Townsend Homeowners Association Line 7 25CV467350 Martin Willerford v. Click LINE 7 or scroll down for ruling. Ford Motor Company et al.

- oo0oo -

9:01 A.M. LINE # CASE # CASE TITLE RULING Line 1 24CV433661 LVNV Funding, LLC v. Claim of exemption by judgment debtor Mein Nguyen related to Mein Nguyen wage garnishment. Notice is proper, and the judgment debtor has the burden of proof. The claim is DENIED IN PART and GRANTED IN PART. Judgment debtor’s financial statement shows sufficient non-exempt funds to withhold the judgment debtor’s proposed withholding of $164.35 per month. Judgment creditor to submit proposed order.

- oo0oo -

3

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share