DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CV2026-0513·yolo·Civil·Pro Hac Vice Admission
Hearing 3 months agoGRANTED

Ilasa v. Brixmor LLC

Application to admit Daniel R. Sarther pro hac vice

Hearing date
Jun 9, 2026
Department
Thirteen
Judge
Prevailing
Moving Party
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

DefendantCalifornia Property Owner I, LLC
DefendantPetSmart LLC

Attorneys

Daniel R. Sartherfor Defendant

Ruling

Case: Ilasa v. Brixmor LLC Case No. CV2026-0513 Hearing Date: June 9, 2026 Department Thirteen 9:00 a.m.

Defendants California Property Owner I, LLC, improperly sued as Brixmor LLC, and PetSmart LLC’s application to admit Daniel R. Sarther pro hac vice is GRANTED. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 9.40.)

The notice of motion does not provide notice of this Court’s tentative ruling system as required by Local Rule 11.2(b). Counsel for moving party, or the moving party if unrepresented by counsel, is ordered to notify the opposing party or parties immediately of the tentative ruling system.

If no hearing is requested, and no party appears at the hearing, this tentative ruling is effective immediately. No formal order pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 3.1312 or further notice is required.

5 of 7

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share