DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD26681319·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing 3 months agoGRANTED

DISH SF VS. ERIC HERRERA ET AL

Motion To Set Aside Default, Vacate Default Judgment, And Recall Writ Of Possession

Hearing date
Jun 9, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffDISH SF
DefendantERIC HERRERA

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD26681319 - June 9, 2026 Hearing date: June 9, 2026 Case number: CUD26681319 Case title: DISH SF VS. ERIC HERRERA ET AL Case Number: | | CUD26681319 | Case Title: | | DISH SF VS. ERIC HERRERA ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-06-09 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Motion To Set Aside Default, Vacate Default Judgment, And Recall Writ Of Possession | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for June 9, 2026. Line 11.

DEFENDANT Motion To Set Aside Default, Vacate Default Judgment, And Recall Writ Of Possession is GRANTED. No opposition filed. The default entered on March 11, 2026 is set aside, and the default judgment entered on March 23, 2026 is vacated. The writ issued on April 30, 2026 is recalled. Defendant Eric Herrera shall file and serve the proposed answer within five days. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share