DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC24620602·sf·Civil·Discovery
Hearing 3 months agoSet for Law and Motion/Discovery Calendar

YOSSELIN CORONADO GARCIA VS. ROCCAPULCO ET AL

Notice Of Motion And Motion To Compel Plaintiff Yosselin Coronado Garcia?S Responses To Special Interrogatories And Request For Sanctions

Hearing date
Jun 10, 2026
Department
302
Judge
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Discovery rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffYosselin Coronado Garcia
DefendantRoccapulco
DefendantLeticia Luna as Trustee of Leticia M Luna Revocable Trust
DefendantBlue Ice Entertainment, LLC dba Roccapulco Supper

Attorneys

Jessica Marsellafor Defendant

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Law & Motion / Discovery Dept 302 - CGC24620602 - June 10, 2026 Hearing date: June 10, 2026 Case number: CGC24620602 Case title: YOSSELIN CORONADO GARCIA VS. ROCCAPULCO ET AL Case Number: | | CGC24620602 | Case Title: | | YOSSELIN CORONADO GARCIA VS. ROCCAPULCO ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-06-10 09:00 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion To Compel Plaintiff Yosselin Coronado Garcia?S Responses To Special Interrogatories And Request For Sanctions; Memorandum Of Points And Authorities; Declaration Of Jessica Marsella, Esq. | Rulings: | | Set for Law and Motion/Discovery Calendar on Wednesday, June 10, 2026, Line 5. 4 - DEFENDANTs LETICIA LUNA AS TRUSTEE OF LETICIA M LUNA REVOCABLE TRUST, BLUE ICE ENTERTAINMENT, LLC DBA ROCCAPULCO SUPPER Notice Of Motion And Motion To Compel Plaintiff Yosselin Coronado Garcia?S Responses To Special Interrogatories And Request For Sanctions. (The full tentative ruling will be available on the San Francisco Superior Court website today after 3:00 p.m.) | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share