G. PAUL BOSCHETTI VS. BRYAN RAY
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED/CONTEMPT
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25678972 - June 8, 2026 Hearing date: June 8, 2026 Case number: CUD25678972 Case title: G. PAUL BOSCHETTI VS. BRYAN RAY Case Number: | | CUD25678972 | Case Title: | | G. PAUL BOSCHETTI VS. BRYAN RAY | Court Date: | | 2026-06-08 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED/CONTEMPT |
Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for June 8, 2026. Line 4. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED/CONTEMPT The Court is in receipt of Mr. Gamino's response to the OSC. Based on Mr. Gamino's response, the OSC is discharged. =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849). Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”