ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY TIMOTHY SEAN KELLY, ESQ., SHALL NOT BE HELD IN CONTEMPT OF COURT
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25679657 - July 30, 2026 Hearing date: July 30, 2026 Case number: CUD25679657 Case title: BRICK & TIMBER, INC. VS. ANTHONY FURTADO ET AL Case Number: | | CUD25679657 | Case Title: | | BRICK & TIMBER, INC. VS. ANTHONY FURTADO ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-07-30 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY TIMOTHY SEAN KELLY, ESQ., SHALL NOT BE HELD IN CONTEMPT OF COURT | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for July 30, 2026. Line 7. OSC Why Timothy Kelly Shall not be Held in Contempt of Court is OFF CALENDAR.
The Court received Mr. Kelly's response and the OSC is discharged. The Court notes that Mr. Kelly failed to provide a courtesy copy of the Response to Department 501. =(501/CFH)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).
Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”