DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
24CV449537·santaclara·Civil·Civil
Hearing 3 months agoOFF CALENDAR

Anna Demby v. FCA US, LLC et al.

Motion to compel the deposition of plaintiff Anna Demby

Hearing date
Jun 2, 2026
Department
10
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Discovery rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffAnna Demby
DefendantFCA US, LLC

Ruling

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 10 Honorable Jeffrey B. El-Hajj Blanca Than, Courtroom Clerk 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: 408-882-2210

DATE: June 2, 2026 TIME: 9:00 A.M. / 9:01 A.M. To contest the ruling, call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 P.M. Make sure to let the other side know before 4:00 P.M. that you plan to contest the ruling. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1308(a)(1); Local Rule 8.D.)

**Please specify the issue to be contested when calling the Court and counsel**

Line 4 24CV449537 Anna Demby v. Defendant FCA US, LLC’s motion to compel the deposition of plaintiff FCA US, LLC et al. Anna Demby. The moving party subsequently filed a notice of withdrawal of the motion. The motion is taken OFF CALENDAR.

Line 5 18CV333448 Sudni Foods, LLC Plaintiff Sudni Foods, LLC’s motion to vacate dismissal and enter judgment et al. v. Christin by stipulation. (Code Civ. Proc., § 664.6.) Notice is proper and the motion Christhudhas et al. is unopposed.

The parties signed two stipulations in 2020, under which defendants would make installment payments to resolve the case. Plaintiffs dismissed the action based on those agreements, with the court retaining jurisdiction to enforce the agreements under Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6. A declaration by plaintiff’s counsel indicates plaintiffs received $34,650, and then defendants stopped making payments.

On good cause shown, the motion is GRANTED. The dismissal is vacated and plaintiff is entitled to judgment. Plaintiff is entitled to the stipulated judgment of $82,944.33 (consisting of a principal balance of $117,594.33, less payments received of $34,650). Moving party to submit proposed order and proposed judgment, indicating damages of $82,944.33.

Line 6 22CV409227 George Centeno v. Plaintiff George Centeno’s motion for attorney fees. Notice is not proper; General Motors, there is no proof of service.

The matter is CONTINUED to January 21, LLC 2027, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 10. Plaintiff is ordered to serve all documents related to the motion, including an updated notice indicating the new hearing date. The court will prepare the order.

3

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share