DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25CV462251·santaclara·Civil·Contract
Hearing 3 months agoOFF CALENDAR

Stanford Lodging Club et al vs Stephen Pahl et al

Demurrer

Hearing date
Jun 2, 2026
Department
1
Prevailing
N/A
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Demurrer rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffStanford Lodging Club
DefendantStephen Pahl

Ruling

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 1 Honorable Eunice Lee, Presiding TBD, Courtroom Clerk 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113

DATE: June 2, 2026 TIME: 9:00 A.M. and 9:01 A.M. To contest the ruling, call the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 P.M. Make sure to also let the other side know before 4:00 P.M. that you plan to contest the ruling, in accordance with California Rule of Court, Rule 3.1308(a)(1) and Local Rule 8D.

**Please specify the issue to be contested when calling the Court and counsel**

LAW AND MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS 9:00 A.M. LINES 24CV441593 Fuheng, Inc. et al Motion to Set Aside Attorney’s Fees(Line #1) & 1-2 vs Zihan Liu Motion to Strike (Line #2) Scroll down to Lines 1-2 for Tentative Ruling. LINE 3 25CV462251 Stanford Lodging Demurrer Club et al vs OFF CALENDAR. On May 19, 2026, the plaintiffs filed a First Stephen Pahl et al Amended Complaint rendering the defendants’ demurrer moot.

LINE 4 23CV417259 Christopher Motion for Order Attaching the Spousal Wage Earnings Lockhart vs Scroll down to Line 4 for Tentative Ruling. Jeremy Mariscal et al LINE 5 24CV429470 Mark Sivertsen vs Motion for Attorney’s Fees Ford Motor Scroll down to Line 5 for Tentative Ruling. Company et al LINE 6 24CV453861 Agnieszka Ayotte Petition to Compel Arbitration et al vs Ford Scroll down to Line 6 for Tentative Ruling. Motor Company et al

- oo0oo -

2

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share