| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Indexed | Hearing |
|---|
DEMURRER to COMPLAINT
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC25626859 - October 10, 2025 Hearing date: October 10, 2025 Case number: CGC25626859 Case title: GARY ERWIN VS. BRIDGE HOUSING CORPORATION ET AL Case Number: | | CGC25626859 | Case Title: | | GARY ERWIN VS. BRIDGE HOUSING CORPORATION ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-10-10 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | DEMURRER to COMPLAINT | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Motion calendar for October 10, 2025, line 6.
Defendants' Demurrer to Complaint is OFF CALENDAR. No valid proof of service on file. CRC 3.1300 (c).
There were 2 sets of proofs of service on file in this action as of 5 court days before October 3, 2025, the date the motions were set for hearing. Proof of Service filed on August 28, 2025 was for e-service and was not supported by any evidence that self-represented litigant express agreed to such service. Proof of Service filed on September 15, 2025 attested to purported service under CCP 1011 by delivery "to suite door."
The Court continued the matter and requested supplemental briefing to address the validity of the purported September 9, 2025 service referenced in September 15, 2025 filing.
Moving party filed a supplemental brief advancing 3 distinct arguments, which do not establish that there was proper service of the papers of which the Court was made aware (by a timely filing of a proof of service per CRC 3.1300 (c)) at least 5 court days before the hearing: (1) argument regarding service per CCP 1011(c) was non-responsive to the Court's inquiry regarding September 15, 2025 Proof of Service which did not involve e-service; (2) argument regarding Khourie, Crew & Jaeger v. Sabek, Inc. (1990) 220 Cal.App.3d 1009 was non-responsive as Khourie did not involve service of motion on a self-represented litigant at their apartment per CCP 1011; (3) argument regarding acknowledgement of actual receipt is not supported by any evidence of such acknowledgment of actual receipt on file with the Court at least 5 court days before October 3, 2025. =(501/CFH)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom [Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252]. Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”