LASHANAE EVERETTE v. JAMES WHITE JR.

1 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 4

5) 6 LASHANAE EVERETTE,) Case Number: FDV-25-818208) 7 Petitioner) Hearing Date: May 12, 2026) 8 VS.) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM) 9 JAMES WHITE JR.,) Department: 403) 10 Respondent) Presiding: BOBBY P. LUNA) 11) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER: TEMPORARY EMERGENCY ORDER, CHILD CUSTODY, VISITATION 13 (PARENTING TIME), CHANGE, RENEWED REQUEST MOTION FOR 14 RECONSIDERATION/ORDER SHORTENING TIME; REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGE OF CHILD 15 CUSTODY, VISITATION (PARENTING TIME), MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION & ORDER 16 SHORTENING TIME 17 TENTATIVE RULING 18 Having read and considered the pleadings, declarations, and other evidence submitted in this matter, the 19 Court makes the following findings and orders: 20 A.

Procedural History 21 1) The parties to this proceeding are Petitioner LaShanae Evereet (Mother) and Respondent James 22 White Jr. (Father). There are two minor children subject to this proceeding: Jezzelle M. White 23 (DOB: 07/24/19) and Ja’Zara M. White (DOB: 08/14/23). 24 2) On March 5, 2026, Respondent filed a motion for reconsideration of the Restraining Order After 25 Hearing issued April 9, 2025. In addition, Respondent requests the Court modify the existing 26 child custody/visitation orders.

Petitioner presently has sole legal and sole physical custody and 27 Respondent has no visitation. The Restraining order lists the children as protected parties. 28 3) On May 8, 2026, Petitioner filed a Responsive Declaration, which has been read and considered 29 by the Court.

1 B. Findings and Order 2 1) Father’s request to set reconsider and set aside the Domestic Violence Restraining Order issued 3 April 9, 2025 is DENIED. The motion was not filed timely and there is no legal basis for 4 reconsideration or set aside. 5 2) Father’s request for modification of custody is DENIED. Mother shall continue to have sole legal 6 and sole physical custody of the minor children. 7 3) Father’s request for visitation is GRANTED. Father shall have agency supervised visitation with 8 the minor children one time per week for up to two hours, if permitted by the agency.

Father’s 9 visitation shall be supervised by Rally Family Services, with Father responsible for 100% of the 10 costs. Mother and Father shall promptly comply with Rally intake requirements. 11 4) Father may have video calls with the minor children three times per week from 6:00 p.m. to 6:15 12 p.m. Mother shall provide the Father with any information necessary for him to make the video 13 calls by 5:00 p.m. on Wednesday, May 13, 2026. During the video calls, Father may not speak 14 with the minor children about Mother.

If Father discusses Mother, Mother may terminate the 15 calls. 16 5) All prior orders not in conflict with the orders made herein remain in full force and effect. 17 6) The Court will prepare the Findings and Order After Hearing. 18