REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF CHANGE OF CHILD CUSTODY, VISITATION (PARENTING TIME)
1 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 4
5) 6 RAYANNE MARIE INGRAM,) Case Number: FMS-19-387272) 7 Petitioner) Hearing Date: April 30, 2026) 8 VS.) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM) 9 ROBERTO SCHOLL,) Department: 403) 10 Respondent) Presiding: BOBBY P. LUNA) 11) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF CHANGE OF CHILD CUSTODY, VISITATION 13 (PARENTING TIME) 14 TENTATIVE RULING 15 Having read and considered the pleadings, declarations, and other evidence submitted in this matter, the 16 Court makes the following findings and orders: 17 A. Procedural History 18 1) The parties are Petitioner Rayanne Marie Ingram (Mother) and Respondent Roberto Scholl 19 (Father).
The minor child subject to this proceeding is Xavier Robert Scholl (DOB: 09/04/18). 20 2) On February 18, 2026, Father filed a Request for Order seeking modification of the existing child 21 custody and visitation orders. The existing order, filed on January 18, 2023, awards joint legal 22 custody to both parents and sole physical custody to Mother. In addition, Father was awarded 23 parenting time on the 2nd and 4th Thursdays from 3:00 p.m. – Fridays at 11:00 a.m., and on the 1st 24 and 3rd weekends from Fridays at 6:00 p.m. – Sunday at 6:00 p.m.
Father seeks the following 25 modifications: 26 a. Joint physical custody. 27 b. Week 1: Friday 6:00 p.m. – Sunday 6:00 p.m.; Monday 6:00 p.m. – Wednesday 6:00 28 p.m.; and Thursday 6:00 p.m. – Friday 6:00 p.m. 29 c. Week 2: Monday 6:00 p.m. – Wednesday 6:00 p.m.
1 d. Week 3: Friday 6:00 p.m. – Sunday 6:00 p.m.; Monday 6:00 p.m. – Wednesday 6:00 2 p.m.; and Thursday 6:00 p.m. – Friday 6:00 p.m. 3 e. Week 4: Monday 6:00 p.m. – Wednesday 6:00 p.m. 4 f. Week 5 (Alternating): Monday 6:00 p.m. – Wednesday 6:00 p.m. 5 g. A holiday schedule. 6 3) On March 23, 2026, Mother filed a Responsive Declaration wherein she asks the Court to deny 7 Father’s requests and the maintain the existing orders. 8 4) On April 6, 2026, the Court referred the parties to Family Court Services (FCS) Mediation on 9 April 13, 2026 and set a review hearing on April 30, 2026.
The parties did not reach an 10 agreement during FCS Mediation. 11 B. Findings and Order 12 1) This Court has jurisdiction to make child custody orders in this case under the Uniform Child 13 Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act. A violation of this order may subject the party in 14 violation to civil or criminal penalties, or both. The country of habitual residence of the minor 15 child(ren) is the United States. 16 2) Father’s request to modify child custody to joint legal and joint physical custody is GRANTED. 17 3) Father’s request to modify the existing parenting plan is GRANTED.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
1 4) Father’s request for a holiday schedule is DENIED. Mother and Father are encouraged to work 2 cooperatively together to establish a holiday schedule on their own. If they are unable to agree on 3 a holiday schedule, then they shall follow the parenting time schedule ordered herein. 4 5) Mother and Father may make modifications to this parenting time schedule by mutual written 5 agreement (i.e., email, text, or on paper). 6 6) All prior orders, not in conflict with the orders made herein, shall remain in full force and effect. 7 7) The Court will prepare the Findings and Order After Hearing. 8
12
16
20
24
28
29